How it works

From windscreen to verified evidence, in six steps.

Every step is designed so that what leaves the system is defensible, and what never leaves it stays private.

Driver holding a mounted smartphone inside a car on a residential street.
The workflow

Six steps, each one accountable.

Steps three to five carry most of the design work. Screening suggests; validation and human review decide.

01

Mount and configure before driving

The device is set up while the vehicle is stationary, mounted where it does not obstruct the driver's view, and configured for the vehicle and route before the trip begins.

02

Capture under the applicable laws and consent requirements

Recording starts only where the law allows and where any required notice or consent has been given. Capture is not silent by default, and the driver can see when it is active.

03

Screen events with AI assistance, uncertainty shown

Automated screening flags candidate events and reports a confidence level rather than a verdict. Low-confidence candidates are surfaced as low-confidence, never silently promoted or quietly discarded.

04

Validate integrity, time, location and context

Timestamp, location, device identity and file integrity are all checked, and the surrounding seconds are reviewed so an event is understood in context rather than as an isolated clip.

05

Human review and privacy filtering

A person reviews each candidate before anything is shared, and unnecessary detail — faces, number plates, bystanders — is filtered or withheld according to the intended use.

06

Share only with authorised recipients, under approved procedures

Evidence moves only to recipients with an approved purpose and the authority to hold it, under documented procedures, with the transfer itself recorded.

Footage alone is not enough.

A clip by itself rarely settles a question. What makes an event useful is the context around it: when it happened, where it happened, whether the file is intact, and how confident the system is about what it shows.

That is why this is described as a workflow rather than a camera. Every step exists to stop a later decision resting on a single unverified source.

  • Integrity and provenance recorded alongside the event
  • An explicit confidence level, never a verdict
  • Privacy filtering before sharing, not after
  • A human decision at the point of consequence

None of this is in general availability today. We are describing the intended design so it can be tested and challenged before anyone relies on it.

Where to go next

Read the technology, or talk to us about a pilot.

The technology overview sets out the intended architecture in detail. The contact form reaches the people designing it.

Two-lane road winding through dry trees at sunset, seen through a vehicle windshield.